Sigs?

[n i g h t . . .]

1.

2.

3.


4.

5.

6.

Ok now for avatars:

[Ghosty]

I voted 1,
3 is also nice and better than 2 which is similar
4 is also good, i like the Angel night
I don't like 6, and 5 is only O.K.

for avatars i'm sticking with the one you have, the middle one i believe

[Jaggy]

I think #3 for the sig and the last one for the avatar.

[c.e.c.i.l]

I like the middle avatar and sig #3

[n i g h t . . .]

C.e.C.i.L said:

I like the middle avatar and sig #3

Your signature is better than any of mine though. ;D ;D

[SNK!]

I voted the 3rd one since it is the only one even remotely shaped like a sig. Also, I hate your current avatar since it uses the same laharl image used in my current sig.

[n i g h t . . .]

Ah, crap. Did you go to google and search for that image?

Also, why don't the rest look like signatures? I can understand 2 & 6 but...

[SNK!]

[quote author=[night] link=board=general&thread=1064081122&start=6#0 date=1064094970]Ah, crap. Did you go to google and search for that image?

Also, why don't the rest look like signatures? I can understand 2 & 6 but...[/quote]Well, their dimensions are just kind of...squarish...it's not that that makes them bad, it's just that they look more like avatars than sigs...

[n i g h t . . .]

I see... BTW I didn't notice you were a girl... just stating. There are, as I've been noticing, a lot of girls on this forum. I didn't know Sokar was either until yesterday.

[SNK!]

[quote author=[night] link=board=general&thread=1064081122&start=8#0 date=1064095376]I see... BTW I didn't notice you were a girl... just stating. There are, as I've been noticing, a lot of girls on this forum. I didn't know Sokar was either until yesterday.[/quote]Yeah, many people have begun to notice my feminine charm now.

[Ghosty]

s-n-k said:

Yeah, many people have begun to notice my feminine charm now.

rofl....

but back on the topic:

yeah now that i notice it, SNK is right, they don't look like sigs, more like rectangular, large, avatars. The art for them looks nice, even #3 doesn't look like a sig too much, they should be really wide and really short... like a fat dwarf ;D

you can still use them though, just because they don't look like other sigs doesn't mean they're bad.

[n i g h t . . .]

Yeah... yeah... yeah... I'm working on it.

[Mr_Beardsly]

Another vote for Sig three. As in regards to sig 5, I don't reccomend using glowing edges for stuff like that. Unless someone has seen it, they'll have no idea what it is... although I suppose my avatar ensures that they do. The first Laharl avatar is better than the second IMO.

[Vapour]

[glow=navy,2,300]Signature number 3, avatar number 2.[/glow]

[n i g h t . . .]

vapour217 said:

[glow=navy,2,300]Signature number 3, avatar number 2.[/glow]

Yeah, but sadly due to recent events, I'm not supposed to use avatar number 2 because then it "might get old to look at".