Amsay64
Experienced Knight
RPG Race: Archer
Posts: 542
|
Post by Amsay64 on May 24, 2002 20:36:25 GMT -5
i disliked the movie because it was too different from the comics.... only in small ways... but they added up
|
|
Rookie Soldier
Posts: 0
|
Post by on May 24, 2002 20:43:52 GMT -5
I already said what i think about it in a previous post
|
|
Amsay64
Experienced Knight
RPG Race: Archer
Posts: 542
|
Post by Amsay64 on May 24, 2002 20:44:35 GMT -5
i know snkkid i just had to re-word it
|
|
Rookie Soldier
Posts: 0
|
Post by on May 24, 2002 20:46:22 GMT -5
and make it a post
|
|
fox40k
Master Swordsman
Hi, im a fish...err, Psycho Rabid Penguin
Posts: 880
|
Post by fox40k on May 24, 2002 20:48:54 GMT -5
i never read the comics before but didn;t he makes thing to shoot the web not come out of his arms?
|
|
Amsay64
Experienced Knight
RPG Race: Archer
Posts: 542
|
Post by Amsay64 on May 24, 2002 20:49:59 GMT -5
exactly fox... its small things like that
|
|
|
|
Post by GucciSweater on Jul 24, 2002 11:51:42 GMT -5
czxczxczxc
|
|
|
|
Post by Sokar468 on Jul 24, 2002 12:44:56 GMT -5
I never read the comics. I would only watch the TV show every now and then.
|
|
|
|
Post by Destin_Faroda on Jul 24, 2002 13:06:44 GMT -5
I think the comic is better. Also yes he made the web shooter which makes more sence. Why do I say that because spiders webs come from thier back why with it for him just naturally come out of his arms. In the comics I belive he got the idea of creating the web solution. Also in the comics he sometimes runs out of webbing so he has to reload mid-fall or sometimes he runs out completly.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sokar468 on Jul 24, 2002 13:08:59 GMT -5
I think the comic is better. Also yes he made the web shooter which makes more sence. Why do I say that because spiders webs come from thier back why with it for him just naturally come out of his arms. In the comics I belive he got the idea of creating the web solution. Also in the comics he sometimes runs out of webbing so he has to reload mid-fall or sometimes he runs out completly. For the purpose of the movie, tho, it was better to have his web shooters biological. It helped keep the flow of the movie going. |
|
Tim
Master Swordsman
RPG Race: Archer
Posts: 1,039
|
Post by Tim on Jul 25, 2002 0:14:26 GMT -5
I've never read any of the comics, but I would probably agree with sokar, about how it kept the flow of the movie going
|
|
Amsay64
Experienced Knight
RPG Race: Archer
Posts: 542
|
Post by Amsay64 on Jul 25, 2002 20:33:59 GMT -5
he actually created the webshooters onto his arms because when he was bit some of the brain cells of the spider transmitted into his blood so the web fluid mixture came naturally!
|
|
|
|
Post by DragoonWraith on Jul 26, 2002 14:58:02 GMT -5
ok, i have not read the comics, but ive watched the cartoons, but i HATED the movie, as a movie (and as spiderman, for that matter). the action scenes were really cool, but there were only two of them! the rest was horrible lovey-dovey scenes or even worse scenes of peter parker embarassing himself, and it wasnt even funny!
|
|
|
|
Post by D-Guy on Jul 26, 2002 15:02:10 GMT -5
ya I liked the cartoon better than the movie.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lans Tartare on Jul 27, 2002 16:40:09 GMT -5
I think the comic is better. Also yes he made the web shooter which makes more sence. Why do I say that because spiders webs come from thier back why with it for him just naturally come out of his arms. In the comics I belive he got the idea of creating the web solution. Also in the comics he sometimes runs out of webbing so he has to reload mid-fall or sometimes he runs out completly. As real spiders shoot from their backs....I think it would be rather stupid that he would have the webshooter at his ass!! though....even the webshooter at his arm doesn't make all that much of sense! |
|
