fox40k
Master Swordsman
Hi, im a fish...err, Psycho Rabid Penguin
Posts: 880
|
Post by fox40k on May 24, 2002 20:24:58 GMT -5
Just want to know what u guy out there think
|
|
Amsay64
Experienced Knight
RPG Race: Archer
Posts: 542
|
Post by Amsay64 on May 24, 2002 20:26:48 GMT -5
i like games with RP value because a game you can only play once, then your done is boring
|
|
Mr_Beardsly
Experienced Knight
RPG Race: Archer
Posts: 598
|
Post by Mr_Beardsly on May 24, 2002 20:27:54 GMT -5
Yeah, but whats the point of playing it over and over again if the game isn't even good? I say its definetly gameplay.
|
|
fox40k
Master Swordsman
Hi, im a fish...err, Psycho Rabid Penguin
Posts: 880
|
Post by fox40k on May 24, 2002 20:28:06 GMT -5
crap i forgot to include music in the selections
ha that sentence sound dumb
|
|
|
Post by GucciSweater on Jul 24, 2002 11:46:03 GMT -5
cxgfxgxf
|
|
|
Post by Sokar468 on Jul 24, 2002 12:43:02 GMT -5
Gameplay first, then graphics.
Ease of controls I think is critical. A game with crappy controls or a bad interface is too frustrating to play.
|
|
|
Post by Destin_Faroda on Jul 24, 2002 12:57:04 GMT -5
I don' think one quality makes or breaks the game. It is the combination of them that can create a good game. Also if a game is lacking in one area such as music or graphics it can still be a good game.
Also other quality should be fun/enjoyable because that is why we play game, to have fun.
|
|
|
Post by Sokar468 on Jul 24, 2002 12:57:54 GMT -5
I don' think one quality makes or breaks the game. It is the combination of them that can create a good game. Also if a game is lacking in one area such as music or graphics it can still be a good game. Also other quality should be fun/enjoyable because that is why we play game, to have fun. True, a game consists of multiple components working in unison. however, I believe some companies have their priorities wrong.
|
|
Gares
Experienced Knight
New School Legend
Posts: 581
|
Post by Gares on Jul 24, 2002 12:58:28 GMT -5
exactly. The qualities of a game ALL have to be equally good for a good game. If it has great graphics, but nothing else. Than it's a bad game.
|
|
|
Post by Sokar468 on Jul 24, 2002 12:59:42 GMT -5
exactly. The qualities of a game ALL have to be equally good for a good game. If it has great graphics, but nothing else. Than it's a bad game. I don't like to dismiss the idea, however, that graphics "can't make a game". Think of Myst. It relied upon graphics for its sales. Also, I see replay value as a luxury, not a necessity.
|
|
Gares
Experienced Knight
New School Legend
Posts: 581
|
Post by Gares on Jul 24, 2002 13:01:39 GMT -5
I personally dont like to replay games. Unless there's mutiple endings. Like Tactics Ogre. But that's jut my personal opinion.
|
|
|
Post by OldSchool on Jul 25, 2002 0:44:00 GMT -5
If the gamplay isnt good, then what good are story, multi, and everything else?
|
|
|
Post by Mech on Jul 25, 2002 1:22:41 GMT -5
I chose Gameplay, even though Replay value is just as important to me. What's the point of liking a game if it has horrible gameplay. LOD should be considered a good replay game hehe. [D2 Lord of Destruction]
|
|
|
Post by siddiddie on Jul 25, 2002 1:39:04 GMT -5
Shouldn't gameplay not be an option because the other options make up gameplay?
|
|
|
Post by General Magnus Gallant on Jul 25, 2002 2:25:38 GMT -5
i have to say story... when im enthralled by a game's story i rarely pay attention to anything else, and when its crap... it takes away from the whole game. Any one who agrees tell me!
|
|